Without being argumentative how do you think I worked it all out? ... Exactly that way.
In the above you again failed because you said![:-)]( "Smile")
You aren't supposed to change the EOIP MTU it must stay at 1500 !!!!!!
Please understand >>> the Link MTU <<< needs to be 42 bytes bigger than the >>> EOIP MTU <<<
Otherwise it's impossible for an EOIP frame to pass unfragmented thru the link (sofa and door problem)
So lets write it like this
LINK MTU = EOIP MTU + 42
On your benchtest each ETHERNET MTU should be 1542 but the EOIP MTU should be 1500 which meets the above statement and any EOIP frame passes thru unfragmented.
Your statement about the mangle marking is strange because clearly it's hitting the queue as you said
In the above you again failed because you said
Code:
Lol xD Please read my response again where I clearly stated that I changed both the EOIP MTU as well as the WLAN MTU'sPlease understand >>> the Link MTU <<< needs to be 42 bytes bigger than the >>> EOIP MTU <<<
Otherwise it's impossible for an EOIP frame to pass unfragmented thru the link (sofa and door problem)
So lets write it like this
LINK MTU = EOIP MTU + 42
On your benchtest each ETHERNET MTU should be 1542 but the EOIP MTU should be 1500 which meets the above statement and any EOIP frame passes thru unfragmented.
Your statement about the mangle marking is strange because clearly it's hitting the queue as you said
So there would appear to be another problem as well.I will only be getting around 11Mbps throughput while the queue tree will show near 25Mbps of avg throughput and "red status" throttling intensity.
Statistics: Posted by LdB — Fri Jan 05, 2024 6:44 pm