jargon voor afval,
Sorry Loop, disagree!
The 1009 2.5 port is a mystery to me as its real world WAN throughput is 300-400Mbps whereas the old hex will get you 400-500 Mbps.
Both have two cores..........
The AX3 will get you over 1Gbps and has 4 cores and double the RAM of the L1009, its no contest, and yes the AX3 also has a 2.5g port, probably
to attach to upstream fiber modems but again, if your WAN throughput is not going to optimize that, strange design.
Now to the bogus statement:
Compared to the AX2/3 and the AC2/3, L009 has HW offloaded switching on the bridge with VLAN filtering,
Not true, the AX3, has HW offload...........
...
Sorry Loop, disagree!
The 1009 2.5 port is a mystery to me as its real world WAN throughput is 300-400Mbps whereas the old hex will get you 400-500 Mbps.
Both have two cores..........
The AX3 will get you over 1Gbps and has 4 cores and double the RAM of the L1009, its no contest, and yes the AX3 also has a 2.5g port, probably
to attach to upstream fiber modems but again, if your WAN throughput is not going to optimize that, strange design.
Now to the bogus statement:
Compared to the AX2/3 and the AC2/3, L009 has HW offloaded switching on the bridge with VLAN filtering,
Not true, the AX3, has HW offload...........
...
Statistics: Posted by anav — Fri Mar 15, 2024 5:15 pm