Picture this my ISP gives me - like a /27, where his IP is:
ISP: a.b.c.1
i use a.b.c.2
and a lot:
a.b.c.3 - a.b.c.30 - does not have any use.
I i whould like to use them, so - maybe a classic tunnel, but - my default route is via a.b.c.1, so i whould end up having a.b.c.0/27 ?
also - there are many IPv4 and many - developers - so - one dev == one tunnel ?
Just looking for the best current concept, i don't need any L2 protocols so - VxLAN, EoIP are "too much", and definitly i need a proxyarp (for my ISP to see any MAC on a.b.c.2 - a.b.c.30).
Play with GNS3 / EveNG, then use old (old hardware == i see when i hits performance limits) and test whart is the best (what works) this is one approach, but maybe someone has it done already, so - not to reinvent the wheel ?
ISP: a.b.c.1
i use a.b.c.2
and a lot:
a.b.c.3 - a.b.c.30 - does not have any use.
I i whould like to use them, so - maybe a classic tunnel, but - my default route is via a.b.c.1, so i whould end up having a.b.c.0/27 ?
also - there are many IPv4 and many - developers - so - one dev == one tunnel ?
Just looking for the best current concept, i don't need any L2 protocols so - VxLAN, EoIP are "too much", and definitly i need a proxyarp (for my ISP to see any MAC on a.b.c.2 - a.b.c.30).
Play with GNS3 / EveNG, then use old (old hardware == i see when i hits performance limits) and test whart is the best (what works) this is one approach, but maybe someone has it done already, so - not to reinvent the wheel ?
Statistics: Posted by krzysioD — Mon Jan 01, 2024 4:26 pm